AI coding agents can revolutionize how we develop and validate actuarial models. The below proof of concept shows model configuration for a new product in an hour’s time, including single-cell Excel replication and a summary validation report.
Agents can impact model development across the board. This example focuses on configuration and validation.
| Today | Agent Enabled | |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | Time-consuming and rarely validated against model | Generated automatically; continuously compared against code |
| Code changes & configuration | Manual, error-prone process | Agents turn an Excel example into a code change and update validation |
| Validation | Excel replication may take weeks to complete | Agents replicate model functionality in Excel in minutes |
| Automation | Available at the whim of your model provider | Agents batch runs, build exhibits, and begin interpreting results |
The setup
To use coding agents effectively they must have full access to the underlying model: the code, the assumptions, and the documentation. This setup is unlikely to work with most model-as-a-service providers, where the model itself isn’t easily consumed as context by the agent.
Coding agents are able to digest the entire code base and documentation at once and may also display a high degree of actuarial knowledge (see AnnuityBench for an example).
Detailed example
This example shows the process of replicating a competitor product where you have access to a brochure and filing. A product spec would work in place of the filing/brochure without issue.
Product
- Stacking rollup (4% + 125% of credited rate)
- Income growing at 75% of credited rate after election
- Hedging done on an economic basis
Pricing model
- Custom FIA model in development over the past few months
Tools used
- Claude Code
- Opus orchestrator agent that delegates to Opus/Sonnet subagents
Context
- Full model code and specs available to the agent
Skills
- Custom agent skills govern the research, configuration, and validation process
Process:
- Agent receives product filing and brochure and configures the model
- Model is automatically run for a single cell to produce full audit traces and single-cell replication
- Reviewer skill automatically kicked off to compare configuration to provided materials and assess the quality of the build
- After completion an actuary can use this report to quickly review and confirm the model implementation
Output:
| Output | Description |
|---|---|
| Product configuration |
|
| Audit traces |
|
| Review binder |
|
| Validation report |
|
Cost & time:
The full research/build/validation pipeline was run in Claude Code using Opus 5. The entire process took approximately one hour and cost about $60.